Logged In: NopeMENWOMENVIDEOSTEAMS.LAX.COMFANTASY LEAGUECUSTOMER SERVICESITEMAPLax.com Shopping CartCART
Lax.com
DISCORES  |  STATSD2SCORES  |  STATSD3SCORES  |  STATS
HeadsShaftsGlovesArm PadsShoulder PadsHelmetsRib PadsGoalie StuffFootwear
ApparelAccessoriesString SuppliesBagsGoals & NetsDVD'sGiftsCustom StringingGift Certs
Free Shipping On All Orders Over $99 and < 10 lbs!!!
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row

Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row
by JoeLax44 on February 1, 2004

National Lacrosse League :      January 31, 2004
[ The Game StoryPhiladelphia Wings vs Buffalo Bandits Lacrosse on January 31, 2004]
Philadelphia Wings lacrosse logoBuffalo Bandits lacrosse logo
Philadelphia Wings 10Buffalo Bandits 18
Scoring:Scoring:
    
Saves:Saves:
    
Current Record :     (2-3)Current Record :     (3-2)
Team Page For 2004Team Page For 2004
   

Philadelphia, PA - Things didn’t start off as one would like for the home team. The Philadelphia Wings gave the visiting Buffalo Bandits 7 penalties for 17 minutes in the opening quarter alone. The Bandits were able to capitalize on 4 of the 5 extra-man opportunities, jumping out to a 6-0 lead after the first. The scoring was started less than one minute in when Buffalo’s Aime Caines found Jason Crosbie who put it away. Then the penalties began. John Tavares took a feed from Jonas Derks and directed a left-handed laser past Wings’ keeper Dallas Eliuk.

On another man-up opportunity, Tavares this time fed Crosbie who added his second goal. Less than 40 seconds later, AJ Shannon used a nice face dodge to create a point blank opportunity, which ended up in the back of the net. Less than 5 minutes into the game, the Bandits were up 4-0. The Wings tried to get some momentum going, by winning the face-off and seemingly scoring on a fastbreak. However, the Wing forward stepped in the crease and the goal wasn’t counted. The Bandits would go on to add two more man-up goals in the first quarter, one by Mike Accursi and the other by Jason Clark. Clark’s goal showed the ball movement clinic that the Bandits would put on all night, as Crosbie hit Tavares who hit Clark alone on the backdoor for the goal. Sandwiched between those two goals was a great save by Bandits’ keeper Steve Dietrich on a 4-3 Wings’ man-up opportunity, where Dietrich slid across and stopped a wide-open point-blank shot. Dietrich’s play would be a theme throughout the evening.

It didn’t take long for the 13,461 fans to let their frustration be known. The first boos appeared towards the end of the first quarter. At the buzzer, the rest of the crowd joined in. However, as Philly fans have long proved, they may be hard on their teams, but they always come around, at least when they’re winning or playing hard, as the Wings did throughout the game.

The second period seemed to just be a continuation of the first. The refs did however slow the whistle down somewhat. The Bandits added a goal by Neal Powles 1:38 in. The then decided to put on a show. Buffalo’s Mark Steenhuis hit Jonas Derks on the crease with a nice behind-the-back feed, only to be stuffed by Dallas Eliuk. Buffalo’s Dietrich responded by making four point blank saves.

The Wings again teased the home crowd by having another goal waved off due to a crease violation. Only to score their real first one about a minute later when Dallas Eliuk made a save while being a man-down, hit a breaking Paul Cantabene, who then hit a streaking Dan Marhol. Marhol adjusted to the pass, faked high, went low and put the Wings on the board. Keith Cromwell added another goal for the Wings less than a minute later, which brought the crowd roaring back to life. While the boos may have seemed loud, it couldn’t compare with the feeling after the Wings cut further into the lead. Tony Henderson added the first of his four goals in less than a minute. It looked as if the Wings had developed momentum by scoring three goals in three minutes. The Bandits had other plans, as they went on a run of their own, and that was the closest the Wings would get all night. Adding two man-up and one man-down goals in just under three minutes.

The Wings pulled veteran goalie Dallas Eliuk with 2:06 remaining the half, and put Nick Schroeder in to see if he could put a stop to the barrage. Tony Henderson added his second right before the half, to bring the halftime score up to a 11-4 Buffalo advantage.

Buffalo extended it’s lead early in the third quarter with another Tavares goal. Philadelphia answered six minutes later with a Mark Frye man-up goal, and three minutes after Keith Cromwell added his own man-up goal. Buffalo’s Mark Steenhuis, with hair flowing out of his helmet’s earholes, added a short-handed goal at the 12:27 mark for his first of four goals on the day. Henderson completed his hat trick thirty seconds later. Steehuis added Buffalo’s next two goals.

The fourth quarter wasn’t much different from the rest of the game. As the superb goal-tending by Dietrich continued. He wound up with a whopping 50 saves on the day, 19 of which came in the fourth quarter. The Wings outshot the Bandits 60 to 43. The big difference in the game seemed to be how well Buffalo was able to move the ball. Their offense wasn’t geared on driving one-on-one. They played a controlled offense and just moved the ball around expecting to eventually find Philadelphia out of position. They utilized skip passes and their great stick skills all night. Many of their goals came on the backdoor as their passes were consistently on target and quick. Philadelphia, on the other hand, seemed to want to work the shot clock through individual match-ups. A Wing would take the ball out, back up, make a dodge, ultimately it seemed looking to shoot, whereas the Bandits were hitting the open man when the defense was forced to slide.

Many of Dietrich’s saves came because the Wings were taking shots that could have been passed to players in position for better shots. This may be explained by Philadelphia’s injury list for the game. Alternate Captain and leading all-time scorer, Tom Marachek did not play. Neither did forwards Ryan Traynor or Brian Tower, which all contributed to Philadelphia’s offensive problems. The healthier Bandits took advantage of the Philadelphia mistakes early and set the tone for the game.

As a coach, when you look at the game on average there are stats you can look at and they generally lead to success. Statistically, Philadelphia was better than the Bandits. The Wings held a 77-66 ground ball advantage, Paul Cantabene won 18 and Sean Nadelen won 4 of the games 33 face-offs for the Wings, and as mentioned before out-shot the Bandits. The stats that determined the game, unfortunately for the Wings, were the 37 penalty minutes as opposed to Buffalo’s 27, Dietrich’s 50 saves compared to Eliuk and Schroeder’s combined 25, the Wings 5 shot-clock violations next to the Bandit’s 2, and, obviously, goals scored, where the Bandits had 18 to the Wings’ 10.

John Tavares led all scorers with 8 points (4,4). Mark Steenhuis also added 4 goals, as did Tony Henderson for the Wings. The Wings Dan Marhol added a 5 point day (2,3), as Jake Bergey also added 3 assists, but was unable to find the back of the net on any of his 11 shots.

An interesting sidenote: you know you’re in Philadelphia when cheesesteaks, not t-shirts are shot into the stands by cheerleaders.

Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 1
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 2
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 3
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 4
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 5
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 6
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 7
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 8
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 9
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 10
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 11
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 12
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 13
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 14
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 15
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 16
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 17
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 18
Bandits hand Wings Third Loss in a row pic 19
More Shots...
 pic 20 pic 21 pic 22
Reply to this story >
New Subject: Retro Lacrosse Movement
by (#37283) on 2/03/04 @1:22AM
 Sorry guys...I wanted to get something off my chest and needed a place to start. Hopefully this will get around.
So throwback jerseys have been and are continuing to be popular. Why doesn't someone come up with a movement to help popularize lacrosse by marketing retro lacrosse jerseys and other appearal. I think people who are genuine or marginal lacrosse fans would purchase a Boston Blazers jersey, or a Detroit Turbos t-shirt. I also think the old Brine pentagon t shirts were pretty cool too. (I had a UNC one). Hopefully if you see this and agree with me you will help and get people talking about it.
 
Reply to this
   
throwback jersey's
by (#57089) on 2/04/04 @8:10PM
 hell yes that would be cool. i'de buy them. i also think that the NLL teams should all have a retro line of jerseys out. Good idea man.
 
Reply to this
      
Retro NLL Jerseys?
by (#58511) on 2/10/04 @1:43PM
 Given that this league seems to sell teams and swap cities at the rate of two or three per year, I don't think marketing jerseys from back in the day is foremost on the priority list. They can't sell enough gear to support the teams that are still in business today, so I'm not optimistic about jerseys from teams that didn't survive.

Why does a league that sells itself as affordable entertainment charge $140 for a Colorado Mammoth jersey? I can get an authentic NBA jersey for the same price.
 
Reply to this
NLL/BOX/FIELD
by (#64765) on 2/11/04 @6:38PM
 The NLL is the greatest and id like ppl to realize that the NLL isnt box lacrosse but they are similar. The MLL id like to complain about but i live in the great white north so i dont know much about it. Field lacrosse is ok, but its kind of a gentlemans game whereas box is kill/murder. I think the box lacrosse in the states really needs to start up cuz its 10x better than field and thats all u guys play.
 
Reply to this