Logged In: NopeMENWOMENVIDEOSTEAMS.LAX.COMFANTASY LEAGUECUSTOMER SERVICESITEMAPLax.com Shopping CartCART
Lax.com
DISCORES  |  STATSD2SCORES  |  STATSD3SCORES  |  STATS
HeadsShaftsGlovesArm PadsShoulder PadsHelmetsRib PadsGoalie StuffFootwear
ApparelAccessoriesString SuppliesBagsGoals & NetsStarter KitsGiftsCustom StringingGift Certs
Free Shipping On All Orders Over $125 and < 10 lbs!!!
Playoff Protocols

Playoff Protocols
by neil on February 20, 2001

Division I

Twelve-team, single-elimination tournament. One team is selected from each of the three geographical regions, Northeast, Southeast and West. Also, four conferences - the America East Conference, ECAC, Ivy League and Patriot League -- receive automatic qualification for their champion. The remaining teams are selected at large.

The Division I Men's Lacrosse Committee selects and seeds teams based on won-lost record, strength of schedule and eligibility and availability of student-athletes. When evaluating teams' won-lost records and strength-of-schedule, the committee considers the following additional factors (not in priority order):

  • Head-to-head competition.
  • Results against the top 10 teams, as voted upon by the regional advisory committee.
  • Results against teams not under consideration.
  • Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) rank, based on the entire Division I schedule.
  • Strength-of-schedule index and power rating, based on the 10 highest-rated teams on a school's schedule. Note: It is possible for a Division II or Division III team to be ranked higher than a Division I team.
  • In order to be considered for at-large selection, teams must have a .500 or better record against all opponents.
In addition, the Men's Lacrosse Committee has developed a strength-of-schedule index and a power-rating system that is used only as an aid during the Division I selections. These are calculated after each regional advisory committee member ranks all teams in his division and all of their opponents on a one-through-five basis, with a "one" being the highest rating. Opponents' total rating points are divided by a team's total number of games to arrive at a strength-of-schedule index. Power ratings are developed using the same one-through-five ratings. Both the strength-of-schedule index and the power-rating systems are used only as selection guidelines. Each divisional committee reserves the right to deviate from these figures, based on the criteria listed and in the championships' best interest. The committee considers only games against the teams with the 10 highest ratings on each team's schedule.

Members of Division I Automatic Qualifying Conferences

AMERICA EAST CONFERENCE:

University of Delaware, Drexel University, University of Hartford, Hofstra University, Towson University and University of Vermont.

ECAC:

Georgetown University; University of Maryland, Baltimore County; University of Massachusetts, Amherst; United States Naval Academy; Pennsylvania State University; Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick and State University of New York at Stony Brook.

IVY LEAGUE:

Brown University, Cornell University, Dartmouth University, Harvard University, University of Pennsylvania, Princeton University and Yale University.

PATRIOT LEAGUE:

United States Military Academy, Bucknell University, Colgate University, Hobart College, College of the Holy Cross, Lafayette College and Lehigh University.

Division I NCAA Men's Lacrosse Committee (selects tournament field):

Fred Acee, U.S. Air Force Academy; John Desko, Syracuse University; Chappy Menninger, Mount St. Mary's College (Maryland); Harry Royle, Hofstra University and Dominic D. Starsia, University of Virginia.

Division I Advisory Committee:

Harry Royle, Hofstra University, chair; Steve Beville, University of Vermont; Bill Dirrigl, Rutgers University; Dick Edell, University of Maryland, College Park; John Espey, State University of New York at Stony Brook; Bill Lawson, Lafayette College and B.J. O'Hara, Hobart College.

Division I Important Dates

Sunday, May 6
Selection and announcement of teams participating in the championship
Saturday, May 12
South first-round competition (University of Maryland, Baltimore County)
Sunday, May 13
North first-round competition (U.S. Military Academy)
Saturday, May 19
North quarterfinal competition (Hofstra University)
Sunday, May 20
South quarterfinal competition (University of Maryland, College Park)
Tuesday, May 22
Telephonic press conference for coaches of Division I semifinalists
Saturday, May 26
Semifinals, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, Rutgers Stadium
Monday, May 28
Final, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, Rutgers Stadium

Division II

Four-team single-elimination tournament. Two teams are selected from each of the two geographic regions, Northeast and Southwest.

The Division II Men's Lacrosse Committee selects teams based on won-lost record, strength of schedule, and eligibility and availability of student-athletes, with the primary emphasis on in-region results. The committee considers out-of-region and out-of-division competition (Division I, Division III or NAIA) as a secondary factor, if a decision is not made based upon the primary in-region criteria. When teams under consideration are basically tied on all criteria, the committee selects teams by looking at the following criteria in rank-priority order between these teams: head-to-head competition, results against common opponents and results against teams already selected.

2000-01 NCAA Division II Regions

NORTHEAST REGION:

Adelphi University, American International College, Assumption College, Bentley College, Bryant College, C.W. Post/Long Island Campus, Dowling College, Franklin Pierce College, *Green Mountain College, Le Moyne College, Merrimack College, Molloy College, New Hampshire College, University of New Haven, New York Institute of Technology, Pace University, Saint Anselm College, Southampton Campus of Long Island University, St. Michael's College and West Chester University.

SOUTHWEST REGION:

Catawba College, Lees-Mc Rae College, Limestone College, Mars Hill College, Mercyhurst College, Northwood University, Pfeiffer University, St. Andrews Presbyterian College, Wheeling Jesuit University and Wingate University.

Division II NCAA Men's Lacrosse Committee:

Chip Polak, New Hampshire College, chair; Jim Fritz, Pfeiffer University and Brian Trotter, West Chester University of Pennsylvania.

Division II Important Dates

Sunday, May 6
Selection and announcement of teams participating in the championship
Sunday, May 20
Semifinals, on campus
Tuesday, May 22
Telephonic press conferences for coaches of Division II finalists
Sunday, May 27
Final, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, Yurcak Field

Division III

Fourteen teams will be placed in two competition brackets consisting of seven teams each. The top-seeded teams in each bracket receive a first-round bye. The remaining teams are geographically paired, whenever possible, with winners advancing to the quarterfinals. The first three rounds are played on the campus of one of the competing institutions or at an alternate site approved by the Division III Men's Lacrosse Committee. The final will be played in Piscataway, New Jersey.

Selection Principles:

The 14-team field consists of three selection pools. First, 10 berths (Pool A) will be allocated to automatic-qualifying conferences. The criteria for receiving automatic qualification are outlined in Bylaw 31.3.4 of the NCAA Division III Manual. Second, four berths (Pool B) will be reserved for true independents and those teams that are members of conferences that do not qualify for automatic qualification. Third, no berth (Pool C) will be provided for a team remaining from automatic-qualifying conferences that did not win its automatic berth. The 10 conferences that receive automatic-qualifying berths in 2001 are:

Capital Athletic Conference
Commonwealth Coast Conference
Centennial Conference
Knickerbocker Lacrosse Conference
Middle Atlantic States Collegiate Athletic Conference
New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC)
Old Dominion Athletic Conference
Pilgrim Lacrosse League
State University of New York Athletic Conference (SUNYAC)
Upstate Collegiate Athletic Association

The Division III Men's Lacrosse Committee, in cooperation with the Division III Championships Committee, has developed the following guidelines in an attempt to clearly define the criteria that are used to select the playoff field:


1. Allocation of Berths

  • A. Pool B is composed of independent institutions and institutions that are members of conferences that do not meet the requirements for automatic qualification. Pool C is reserved for institutions from automatic-qualifying conferences that are not their conference champion.
  • B. Berths from Pools B and C are selected on a national basis, using regional-selection criteria. There are no pre-determined regional allocations for Pools B and C.
  • C. Pools B and C cannot be combined.
  • D. There is no maximum or minimum number of berths from one region.
  • E. For the 2001 championship, no conference will receive more than one automatic berth.


2. Selection Criteria
  • A. The Men's Lacrosse Committee selects teams based on conference results and competition within an institution's respective evaluation region. The committee reviews the following primary criteria (in priority order):
    (1) In-region winning percentage, head-to-head results in region, results against common opponents in region.
    (2) Strength of schedule, as demonstrated by regional opponents' winning percentage.
    (3) Results against teams already in the tournament.
    Note: The committee reviews all three criteria in the order listed. A team may have an excellent winning percentage, but the strength of schedule and results against teams already in the tournament also must be examined.
  • B. If an analysis of the primary criteria does not result in a decision by the committee, the remainder of an institution's schedule (e.g., NAIA, Divisions I and II opponents, and out-of-region play) are evaluated.
3. Regional Alignments. All members of conferences are aligned in the same evaluation region, with the exception of the American Southwest Conference, Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference and University Athletic Association. Members of these conferences shall be placed in their natural geographic region for evaluation purposes.

4. Pairings

  • A. Once the automatic qualifiers are identified and the Pools B and C teams selected, teams are seeded using regional criteria and then grouped into competition brackets according to natural geographic proximity. Teams are paired using seeding and according to geographic policies. Geographic proximity takes precedence over seeding. Flights are kept to a minimum.
  • B. Teams from the same conference do not have to play one another in the first round as long as geographic proximity is maintained.
  • C. If all site-selection criteria are equal (e.g., transportation), the highest seeded team will be selected as the host institution. The criteria for determining sites remain the same.
NORTH EVALUATION REGION

Commonwealth Coast Conference (Automatic Qualifier):

Curry College, Endicott College, Gordon College, New England College, University of New England, Nichols College, Roger Williams University, Salve Regina University and Institute of Technology.

Knickerbocker Lacrosse Conference (Automatic Qualifier):

City College of New York, Montclair State University, Kean University, Manhattanville College, State University of New York Maritime College, Stevens Institute of Technology, U.S. Merchant Marine Academy and Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.

NESCAC (Automatic Qualifier):

Amherst College, Bates College, Bowdoin College, Colby College, Connecticut College, Middlebury College, Trinity College (Connecticut), Tufts University, Wesleyan University (Connecticut) and Williams College.

Pilgrim Lacrosse League (Automatic Qualifier):

Babson College, Clark University (Massachusetts), Lasell College, Maine Maritime Academy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Maritime Academy, *Mount Ida College, Norwich University, Springfield College, Western New England College and Wheaton College (Massachusetts).

Upstate Collegiate Athletic Association (Automatic Qualifier):

Clarkson University, Hamilton College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, St. Lawrence University, Skidmore College, Union College (New York) and Vassar College.

SUNYAC:

State University College at Cortland, State University College at Geneseo, State University College at Oneonta, State University College at Oswego, Plattsburgh State University of New York, State University College at Potsdam, State University of New York and Institute of Technology at Utica/Rome.

Pool B Teams (21):

Alfred University; Castleton State College; Centenary College (New Jersey); Daniel Webster College; Eastern Connecticut State University; Elmira College; Emerson College; Hartwick College; Ithaca College; Johnson State College; Keene State College; Keuka College; University of Massachusetts, Boston; University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth; Nazareth College; Plymouth State College; Rochester Institute of Technology; Salem State College; *State University of New York at Farmingdale; University of Southern Maine and Utica College.

SOUTH EVALUATION REGION

Capital Athletic Conference (Automatic Qualifier):
Catholic University, Goucher College, Mary Washington College, Marymount University (Virginia), St. Mary's College of Maryland, Salisbury State University and York College (Pennsylvania).

Centennial Conference (Automatic Qualifier):

Dickinson College, Franklin & Marshall College, Gettysburg College, Haverford College, Swarthmore College, Washington College (Maryland) and Western Maryland College.

Middle Atlantic States Collegiate Athletic Conference (Automatic Qualifier):

DeSales University; Drew University; Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison; King's College (Pennsylvania); Lycoming College; Messiah College; University of Scranton; Susquehanna University and Widener University.

Old Dominion Athletic Conference (Automatic Qualifier):

Guilford College, Hampden-Sydney College, Lynchburg College, Randolph-Macon College, Roanoke College, Wesleyan College, and Washington and Lee University.

Pool B Teams:

Cabrini College, Colorado College, Denison University, Eastern College, Greensboro College, Kenyon College, Marietta College, College Misericordia, Neumann College, Oberlin College, Ohio Wesleyan University, Shenandoah University, Villa Julie College, Wesley College, Whittier College, Wittenberg University and College of Wooster.

Division III NCAA Men's Lacrosse Committee/Advisory Committee:

Bryan L. Matthews, Washington College (Maryland), chair; Jim Berkman, Salisbury State University; Philip A. Buttafuoco, Eastern College Athletic Conference and Doug Locker, Whittier College.

Division III Important Dates

Sunday, May 6
Selection and announcement of teams participating in the championship
Wednesday, May 9
First-round competition
Sunday, May 13
Quarterfinal competition
Sunday, May 20
Semifinal competition
Tuesday, May 22
Telephonic press conference for coaches of Division III finalists
Sunday, May 27
Final, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, Rutgers Stadium




Reply to this story >
Once Again
by (#55) on 2/20/01 @5:04PM
 Once again Div. III is going to have 7 good teams and 7 bad teams in the first round. I'm willing to bet that the average margin of goals between teams in the first roung will be 15 or more. What a crappy set up.
 
Reply to this
   
DivIII
by (#6834) on 2/20/01 @5:42PM
 Why do you feel that there will be 7 good teams in the first round? What might be a better setup? You can't just say this is a bad setup and not give any reasons.
 
Reply to this
Huh
by (#764) on 2/20/01 @7:44PM
 I thought the GWLL gets an AQ after Fairfield joined. They mnake the limit at six teams, Fairfield, Air Force, OSU, ND, Butler, and Denver. They should get an AQ for the League champion instead of the automatic bid the NCAA gives them. I mean, OSU like won the league in 99 and ND got the bid (I can see that ND is a good team, but OSU won the league). Anyway, it's dumb that they don't get an AQ even after getting the minimum 6 teams.
 
Reply to this
   
(no subject)
by (#1128) on 2/20/01 @11:37PM
 Well I think in 99 OSU, ND, and Butler were tri-champions but ND made the tourney based on a better overall W-L record. I coudl be wrong but I'm pretty sure that was what happened. But they technically do get an automatic qualifier b/c there has to be one team selected from the western region.
 
Reply to this
      
Well...
by (#764) on 2/21/01 @9:42AM
 They do get an automatic bid from the west, but it's not the same as an AQ. An AQ is given automatically to the conference champion. That is only decided by W-L records in the conference or a conference championship (America East). The bid that the GWLL gets is given under the old bid rules (like the at-large teams in the tournament, like a Loyola or something). Technically, if OSU won the GWLL next year, and ND got, let's say, third, the Committee could still award ND the bid if they feel that they had a better strength of schedule or something. I think it should be an AQ like the other conferences, where it's given to the conference champ.
 
Reply to this
Some of these "leagues" are jokes
by (#3045) on 2/22/01 @11:37AM
 There just arent enough teams that play division III lax to give leagues AQ's. Some of these leagues are absolute jokes and simply do not deserve AQ's. The CCC is a joke, as is the Knickerbocker conference. Springfield is lucky they got into that Pilgrim conferece, as that league doesnt even go 2 teams deep. Other leagues simply added or have 2 teams that are so weak, the conference is able to have an AQ. Upstate for instance, has no real great teams, but has two jokes-(Vassar and Skidmore), that let the league have legitimacy. Either Washington or Gettesburg will have to get a pool C bid, while some CCC team will be going to the playoffs, and a pool B team will get shafted, a team that is most certainly better than the CCC champion.....Anyway, the super six should have gotten an AQ, because a team in that league or another pool B team will get shafted again so New England College can get embarrased again while serious lax players at Ithaca have to watch a NEC team in the playoffs that they could have beaten by 20 goals. I think the NCAA can come up with a panel to look at everyteams record, strength of schedule, and potential, and put the 16 best teams in from there. You can even do that by region and be fair. This new system is foul
 
Reply to this
   
AQ's
by (#6897) on 2/22/01 @5:31PM
 When the Presidents and AD's voted in AQ's one phrase said it all: "Access over Quality." They are not concerned about whether the top 14 teams are in the tourney. They are providing access to new teams who did not have the opportunity to get into the tournament without AQ's. I'm NOT saying this is "right" or "fair." For the NCAA (university presidents) it's ALL about "Access over Quality"
 
Reply to this
   
bomber
by (#682) on 2/22/01 @5:59PM
 
You bring up some good points, but a lot of what you say is just plain wrong.
First of all, its worse then you think. Washington and Gettysburg can't earn a pool C bid, because there isn't a pool C, any conference with an AQ cannot get into the tourney unless they win the conference. So only one of those two teams gets in.
Second, if you understood the system you would not be complaining that the Super Six doesn't have a bid. This is a good thing for them, it allows a team like Ithaca to get in the tourney even if they don't win their conference. This is why both Denison and OWU can both get in, only conferences without AQ's can have two teams make it, so it is better for Ithaca, they don't have to beat Naz to get in.
Finally stop complaining, if the teams take care of business they will get in the tourney. I agree that some of the teams that will get in the tourney are not the top teams, but it allows for the growth of the sport in the long run. I have no problem with NEC getting in the tourney. But, I do feel the field should be expanded to 16 teams...
Oh, and why would you say Skidmore is a "joke"? Look at how they did last year, they had a pretty good year.
Salisbury St. is just as lucky as Springfield, they will never lose to any of those teams.
 
Reply to this
      
Ok, I see your point D-3 but still
by (#3045) on 2/22/01 @7:59PM
 I was wrong about the pool c bid, I was thinking it was the same as football, which has a similar format (3 pools + AQs) but the major difference is that there are more football teams. This lets them bring in weaker conference champs and still let in most of the teams that deserve to be there. This is not the case in lax in my opinion. Why not have 1 or 2 pool C bids? If I were WAC or Gettysburg, I would get out of that conference right away. I did realize that Ithaca and the upstate teams will make out on this new format, I was more or less complaing about last year when I thought Ithaca kind of got screwed by the format. It is clear that they have a better chance this year. When you look at it though, they are really only trying to compete against the other pool B teams. OWU, Naz, Rit, Denison, Kenyon, and Ithaca look like the top teams fighting for those 4 bids.
What bothers me is the way these conferences are set up. (You are right about SSU and Springfield. They should both have easy passes.) These conferences are not like the Big Ten or ACC or anything. Most of them are simply set up for lax.
-final points- I understand that the NCAA wants to "give more access" to more teams from around the country. They are just going about it the wrong way. The fact is that serious lax players that went to WAC or Gettysburg to win a national championship wont have a chance to go after the national title, while some dude at NEC or CCNY will be going to the playoffs and might not even care. I think D3 lax and do it like D3 football, just add a few more teams. About teams getting the job done D-III, it seems it has too much to do with what conference your in, and less of whats important, how good you are. -again, don't mean to whine, just expressing my thoughts.
 
Reply to this
the NCAA's DIII
by (#6523) on 2/26/01 @8:07PM
 If you play college lacrosse you definately want to go the tournament at least once. I am not one that has great ideas about changing the criteria for selection to the big show. One this is for shure, teams will get shafted out of a berth. It is frustrating when you play on a team that's tarditonally strong and you don't get the berth. I do think that the NCAA is trying to come with the best selction process so everbody is happy. The way that it is set up now many teams that tradionally aren't strong may get some top recruits for being in a conference/league that gets an AQ. Over time there will be an increased number of strong teams, which is ultimately what the NCAA is trying to do, increase the level of play and competition. What do you think?
 
Reply to this