hofstra vs johns hopkins





Division I Men :      May 14, 2011
[ The Game StoryJohns Hopkins vs Hofstra Lacrosse on May 14, 2011]
Johns Hopkins LacrosseHofstra Lacrosse
 Johns Hopkins 12 Hofstra 5
Scoring:Scoring:
Chris Boland
Kyle Wharton
John Greeley
Zach Palmer
Brandon Benn
John Ranagan
Mark Goodrich
Robert Guida
Tim Donovan
Phil Castronova
(2, 3)
(3, 1)
(2, 0)
(1, 1)
(1, 0)
(0, 1)
(0, 1)
(1, 0)
(1, 0)
(1, 0)
Jay Card
Kevin Ford
Brad Loizeaux
Adrian Sorichetti
Ian Braddish
John Antoniades
Jamie Lincoln
(1, 2)
(1, 0)
(1, 0)
(1, 0)
(0, 1)
(1, 0)
(0, 1)
Saves:Saves:
Pierce Bassett
9 (0.643)
Andrew Gvozden
Rob Bellairs
5 (0.333)
0 (0.000)
Current Record:     (13-2)Current Record:     (13-3)
Johns Hopkins 2011 Team PageHofstra 2011 Team Page
   

Lax.com got behind the scenes of one of the hyped up games in the first round. Check out the super smooth slo mo and some great hits and saves. Also check out what Coach had to say about the game.

Reply to this story >

jerseys
    by (#192446) on 5/16/11 @5:14PM
wow both jerseys are soo fresh
 
Reply to this

helmets
    by (#283469) on 5/16/11 @6:33PM
new johns hopkins helmets are sick
 
Reply to this

sickk
    by (#236547) on 5/17/11 @9:48AM
rawest lacrosse video lax.com has made yet
 
Reply to this

video/JHU
    by (#227930) on 5/17/11 @7:27PM
the new helmet decals for Hopkins are dope and agreed, this video is epically awesome! the Maryland and North Carolina one was done nicely as well
 
Reply to this

JHU lids
    by (#284945) on 5/18/11 @10:38PM
I bet more teams start getting large logos like JHU had in this game. They are trend setters in the world of lacrosse. When they broke out the old school cartoon blue jay a couple years ago in the final four, other schools started to use the same idea. Hopkins is always the first one to the new thing.
 
Reply to this

2:42 who was
    by (#264766) on 5/19/11 @5:28PM
that too? haha there was noone there. also i really like the highlights in this game the mix of up close and slow and zoomed out and normal speed was tight
 
Reply to this